Comparing endpoint and real-time PCR for forensic body fluid identification

<p dir="ltr">Identifying the body fluid source of stains can give an indication of activities, prioritize samples for DNA profiling, and provide probative evidence when the presence of DNA alone does not. Messenger RNA profiling assays using endpoint reverse-transcription polymerase-chain reaction (RT-PCR), were developed to address the issues with conventional body fluid identification and have since been used in forensic casework. However, endpoint RT-PCR has a narrow linear dynamic range (LDR), and there is currently no specific method for mRNA quantification to direct case strategy and optimize input template. Real-time reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) collects data during the amplification phase which reflects the starting quantity. The application of RT-qPCR assays as a quantification precursor to endpoint RT-PCR was investigated using previously described assays for circulatory blood, saliva, menstrual fluid, spermatozoa, seminal fluid, and vaginal material. While blood marker <i>SLC4A1</i> and vaginal marker <i>CYP2B7P</i> showed a strong relationship, the remaining body fluid markers lacked a robust predictive relationship, likely due to differences in LDR. <i>CYP2B7P</i> and <i>SLC4A1</i> showed high sensitivity when compared with other markers – resulting in a greater number of data points for estimation of the linear relationship. Compared with endpoint, the RT-qPCR assays had higher precision, LDR, and sensitivity.</p>